Term4Sale ®
term life insurance comparisons
Fine Tuning Income Replacement
by Bob Barney, President of COMPULIFE® Software, Inc.
September 2000
The following article was published in the November 2000
edition of Canadian MoneySaver.
For other important financial advice articles like this, Compulife recommends
that you subscribe to the Canadian
MoneySaver on-line magazine. The annual on-line subscription fee is
only $24.95 CAD per year (That's less than $20 USD per year).
Visit the Canadian MoneySaver
website to learn more.
My last two articles for Canadian
Moneysaver dealt with the subject of how much life insurance you should
buy. I recommended that you buy enough life insurance to replace the income
that you provide to your dependents.
The first article asked and answered the question "You're Worth How
Much?" I said that your financial value was linked to the income that you
earn and how long you'll earn it. I explained how to calculate the lump
sum of money your family would need in order to generate an alternate source
of income. Please note: a new "income replacement calculator" can now be
found at my public term comparison website www.term4sale.com.
In the second article I talked about the other items that life agents
typically say that you need life insurance for. As I explained, such things
are tangents to the fundamental need for insurance (income replacement)
and "baffle insurance buyers with trivial information that confuses and
confounds". If you own enough life insurance to replace your paycheque,
things like mortgage insurance, life insurance for children's education
and insurance for retirement funding are not needed.
In this third and final article we'll look at how to fine tune the income
that you need to provide, and how to provide it.
First, you don't need to replace all of your income simply because your
family won't have to feed and clothe you anymore. That second car you have
may become redundant if you die. Your spouse may no longer need to continue
your membership in the golf club. You can reduce the amount of income that
you earn and provide to your family by the cost of those things that are
attributable to your personal existence. As a rough rule of thumb I used
to assume that principle breadwinners probably personally consumed about
20% of their income. If you are earning $30,000 per year, you could probably
plan to provide $24,000 per year.
Government pension plans may provide spouse and child income benefits.
Look into it and find out how much. Don't assume that you will get the
maximum allowed. Once you know how much the benefit will be, factor that
into the total income your family will get and reduce the amount of income
needed from your life insurance.
I disagree with those who assume their family will have to make lifestyle
changes after their death. A typical statement I used to hear as an agent
was, "My wife will go out to work." Anytime I heard that I'd ask, "Is she
looking for work now?" The answer was usually, "No." I'd ask, "Why not,
couldn't you use the extra money?" At that point it was explained to me
that mom was too busy looking after the kids, taking care of the house,
etc. I'd then ask, "How is that going to change after you're dead?"
Another argument I used to hear was that the family would sell the house
they have now and move to a smaller house. My response to that was, "So
is your house up for sale now?" The answer was, "No." At that point I'd
ask, "Why not, couldn't you use the extra money that living in a smaller
house would give you?" The response was, "But I like living here". I'd
ask, "So why wouldn't your family like living here after you're gone?"
The point is this: why should your family be expected to suffer and
sacrifice because you're dead and gone? Aren't they going to have enough
trouble adjusting to losing you without having to make drastic changes
to the rest of their lives?
More important, how much would any of these strategies really save in
insurance costs? As I noted in the first article, a 40 year old male non-smoker,
in very good health, can buy a $600,000 10 year term policy for less than
$600 per year. Cutting the insurance coverage from $600,000 to $500,000
would only save about $90 per year. Just how much sacrificing do you expect
your family to make to save $90 per year?
The next consideration is other sources of lump sum money. Suppose you
have made all the reasonable adjustments to the income that your family
will need from a lump sum, and you do the calculation and determine you
need a total amount of $450,000. Now suppose that you have $100,000 in
a G.I.C. investment and the money is not currently slated for any specific
purpose. At that point you can reduce the $450,000 to $350,000. You can
correctly assume that you have self-insured yourself for $100,000.
The key to this is "what" that asset/investment is being used for. For
example, if that $100,000 is in your retirement fund, remember that your
spouse will also need to retire. If you argue there is $100,000 of equity
in your home, the only way your family can get at that money is to sell
the house or take out a mortgage. Selling the home alters the lifestyle
(discussed earlier) and taking a mortgage adds strain to the monthly finances.
Simply put, do not assume assets can be used for income replacement unless
they are not already committed to a specific purpose. For example, if the
cash was for a boat you were planning to buy, that's different.
During my early days as a life agent I remember one gentleman and his
wife who were in their 50's. They asked me to review their life insurance;
they had several policies. I took at quick look at their existing policies
then discussed with them their overall finances and plans. I learned they
had inherited a large sum of cash which was invested in various liquid
investments. The entire amount exceeded their needs for retirement or replacement
income. I told them I couldn't understand why they needed to have any life
insurance and suggested they get rid of the life insurance they had. They
were delighted at the advice; no life agent had ever told them they didn't
need life insurance. They promptly got rid of their insurance and referred
me to their children and friends who ended up buying quite a bit of insurance;
insurance those folks did need. The point is this: if the money's in the
bank, you don't need the insurance, you're self-insured.
In terms of the total lump sum needed for replacement income, don't
forget your group insurance at work or the mortgage insurance you may have
with the bank. Those insurance values should be considered part of the
total you need to come up with lump sum for income replacement.
Regarding group insurance, only add it in if you have been steadily
employed with the same employer and only if they have had a good group
plan that you believe will continue. If your group insurance coverage is
$100,000, then reduce your need for personal insurance by $100,000.
If you have a mortgage insurance policy for $80,000, then you can reduce
the insurance for income purposes by $80,000. While the $80,000 should
not factor into the total amount that you actually need, it becomes part
of the total that you have to meet that need.
Note: Make very sure that you are not overpaying for group or mortgage
insurance. A certain amount of group insurance may be provided to you free
of charge and that's a price you can't beat.
Many purchase additional group coverage believing that it is cheap.
Make sure that you carefully compare prices. For example, find out how
much the extra $100,000 of group insurance is actually costing you. When
doing a term comparison first run the comparison for $350,000, then run
a comparison at $250,000 to see how much difference in price you will save
on buying that same coverage through individual insurance. As I noted earlier,
a difference of $100,000 of term insurance, on a 40 year old male, was
only $90 per year. Most people are very surprised at how little that extra
individual term insurance costs.
The point is this: if the individual insurance is as cheap as group
or mortgage insurance (and often it's cheaper), DO NOT buy group or mortgage
coverage. Typically you can lose group insurance if you change jobs. Costs
for your group may not be guaranteed. Mortgage insurance is no different.
Changing banks on your mortgage renewal may mean you have to re-qualify
for the new mortgage insurance policy and if you health has changed, you
may not get it. Your individual coverage would be unaffected. Compare costs
and only buy group or mortgage insurance if it really saves you money.
And finally, there is no point having life insurance unless you have
dependents. If you have no spouse, no children, the reason for having life
insurance is...?
|